|
|
NATIONLIZED HEALTH CARE
|
| |
Mark Feuring - May 20, 2010
While America seems to be at odds over the health care agenda, the pulpit is under the gavel for a new realm of health care coverage. Under President Obama’s proposal, the government will offer a new alternative to people seeking health care. We will have the option of nationalized medicine. The country’s liberal agenda has forced the conservatives, who believe in purely free enterprise, to be taxed with goods that are placed with cost, per material governed. Voters, with their choices of elected representatives in the United States, have said the wars cost too much money. With the number of unemployed and job transitions, stemming from the credit burst, housing bubble, and overseas work, there are a number of reasons to be interested in the talk of nationalized medicine. There are basically millions of Americans who will sign with nationalized medicine. Because of better available health care, the use of hospital emergency rooms for non-emergencies should be reduced. Americans have Medicare and Medicaid but the new government program will encourage competition and allow people another option for health care. People, who are out of work, own or work in small business, or self employed, definitely will be advocates for the new health care bill. Nationalized medicine is necessary to solve the health care crisis in America.
Millions of people in America are not covered by the existing programs concerning health care. Offering nationalized medicine will wake up an existing system with competition. Will Washington D.C. be able to manage such a program? “President Obama has made health-care reform the ultimate test of his first year, but seems prepared to compromise on the significant aspects of the legislation” (2009 – Packer, George – The New Yorker) Some Americans want a nationalized security card because of fear of future terrorist attacks, and they are concerned about the impact of illegal immigration on our economy. The provisions of the 2400 pages of the nationalized health care bill will not be completed until 2018. “Medical mistakes are the nation’s third leading killer, while we spend “sixteen percent of our total income on health insurance.” (Mullaney, 2006 – Business Week) An effective national health plan could address the problem of increasingly expensive prescription drugs. Pharmaceutical companies sell products in countries globally for half the cost of the same product when marketed in the U.S. Right now there are not enough health care options. Americans are looking for safety standards, and are putting our trust into legislatures, because the current systems do not cover all citizens in America. Branding the merchandising of treatment, concerning nationalized care is what people of the United States currently have in municipalities. Americans need other choices of health care.
Affiliate organizations have calculated` their liberal way around the building of a bigger government throughout history. People are lining up in droves to show their political sway. Human interest stories are piling up in the media news about what America is setting up for those in poverty and need. With the President’s liberal mechanism, and the House and Senate in Democratic majority, the time is right to pass nationalized agenda. Victory has been claimed by advocate groups. President Obama, after his first year in office, has completed what has been tried for nearly a century, and that is the passing of health care reform policies which offer the nationalized plan. “Having learned from the mistakes made by reforms in 1993 and ’94, HCAN,” (Health Care for America Now) told President Obama “You have our commitment to play, to contribute, and to help pass healthcare reform this year.” (2010 –Feder, Lester -The Nation) With the decades surmounted, about how and why people who cannot afford a health care plan today, there is a “free” plan supported by taxpayers. Americans strive in daily practice to the best noted individuals with covered health care, and that has taken argument and debate.
Small business owners and independent contractors will benefit from the nationalized government plan. People, who graduate college and start a dental business, may use the program to jumpstart their work. Currently, young dentists work in social welfare places to gain experience. Might that bring about better care, for certain municipalities that need certain types of medicine for the people? Nationalized medicine is a program which is not solely for the homeless. Those people who might have a roofing business that employs ten people would most likely, for the cost, benefit from the program. “Self-employed people with medical conditions will be able to buy insurance at reduced rates. Employers will be required to disclose the value of health-care benefits on workers' W-2 forms. Starting in 2018.” (Klein -2010 – Business Week)
Small business may worry about tax increases, as will the retail consumers. But, for an employment facility that insures ten employees, it is the cost coverage of a family who might have a son or daughter in college. The new plan will cover a student until the age of 26. That builds promiscuity and relations of better development. “Instead of imposing 150 new federal rules on entrepreneurs annually, let's try eliminating 150.” (Shane - 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.) Small business owners have to comply with zoning regulations, safety workplace issues, technology within the facility, and management and financing cues of gaining income, for payment provisions of employees. Small businesses that manage group health care plans, is also a series of work that with more competition in health care, better grounds on investment satisfaction might be met. One important fact of taking on a new job is that it is likely you are not going to be covered under health insurance for the first six months. “Mostly health care agenda in small business is an ongoing problem, which usually gets no attention and is referred to as red-tape. “Simply put, countries that regulate business formation more heavily have fewer startups:” (2009 Shane, Scott McGraw-Hill Companies) Americans need new energy businesses, school intervention experts, more building services, and more media and newspaper startups.
Large companies like Home Depot, Lowes, and fast food restaurants, offer part time work, and sixty to thirty percent of health care coverage. If as an American citizen, you work as a part time employee, that is pertinent to working in a corporate setting, you are privileged with a health insurance plan. The cost of health insurance has gone up “$5,760 in 2004 and $7,500 in 2009.” (Shane - 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.) Is the rise in health care cost due to the corporate settings of covering thousands under one program? Have the corporate entities run out of places to expand and lower costs? "Companies with fewer than 50 employees which make up 96% percent of U.S. businesses are exempt from the mandate that requires larger enterprises to provide health benefits by 2014, or pay a two-thousand penalty per employee.” (2010 Klein, Karen McGraw-Hill Companies) With the bubble burst in the economy, the growth of large business has also slowed down. There are not enough retail corporate jobs to cover all working individuals which has led to the high unemployment rate. Restaurants may be a larger draw to start a family business. There is a new sandwich shop in the mall, down the hall from art stores that make handmade jewelry. How might those places of business provide health insurance. How is a person to compete with the superstores, especially when they offer health insurance to employees?
With standardize programs of health insurance, will Americans have machines with operators scanning and searching with instruments, as expert technicians, instead of workers placing human care in the hands of the medically treated? Those ideas of employing technicians, at places of medical care are already part of the ever-growing medical system. In the future there will be a new brand of workforce professionals, and those patron jobs will also grow because of the competition of healthcare systems. A nationalized plan will eliminate the timing of tests that show the basic or advanced cues of medicine.
The floor debate is on with the arguments covering health care. Americans need renewable energy systems, and those causes will be built with new business practices. Citizens of the United States will have to sustain energy in new realms with new companies, and new expert managers. Americans are seeking a total revamp of our current energy systems such as the nuclear systems and water power dams. Americans need alternative energy with our transportation systems and fuel sources. How can this large country grow on electric transportation when we have so many roads and highways? Can Americans create business that might be socialized with the support of our government representations? Americans have more to do while upgrading business, than just working toward a clean water system. In America citizens have to organize business entities of energy systems that could benefit from nationalized medicine covering employees.
With the increasing number attending hospitals and doctor offices for regular check-ups and emergencies, new jobs will be created. Americans will have to expand our offices of medicine to cover the millions who need nationalize coverage. “Healthcare careers provide the chance to help people do interesting technical work, and earn relatively high salaries” (Dillion, 2008 Occupational Outlook Quarterly) New jobs with new scanning machines will make more detailed work for the radiologist technician. Those machines which were part of an expanding medical system, covering such occupations as physical therapy, and occupational therapy, will grow even more into the next decades. Electronic devices which will scan and input data into expert medical hands will cover the realm of a growing population. New jobs in managing technical qualities will be a large part of the medical care of the future. “Biostatisticians need a strong understanding of and interest in science and mathematics.” (Dillion, 2008 Occupational Outlook Quarterly) The new jobs that will open up with increased competition in health care options will sustain the need for nationalized care.
With advocates and activists arguing about health care coverage in this country, there is a lot to say about being an American. People have in place the American system, where one individual can have the best standards of living in any given region. Americans have leadership in this country that is concerned with the total whole of cooperating with a national plan. Americans have a patron welfare system that measures the total good of being compliant with a set of standards and practices for living. Basically, Americans have to work with nationalized agenda, because of poverty stricken individuals and others who are working independently. Americans must in our country, bless each other with the form of medical coverage that will entice us all to stay healthy and maintain a proper diet in school and work. What if the perfect job would exist for you, and it would be working with new energy systems. It might, with a nationalized healthcare plan you get coverage in job transitions. The time is right to expand health care options, because stagnation and the financial burst have caused gridlock. Americans need to be free to decide where and how we can best affiliate our progress. Whether your cause is Republican conservative or liberal Democrat; you can say your society is working on covering benefits of all people who live under the flag. The Republicans themselves seem to ask for competition with health care, while the Democrats with bi-partisan agenda correlate people in the system to pay the same amount. John McCain “Republican Presidential nominee, stayed true to GOP principles April 29, 2008 when he unveiled a health-care reform proposal that leans heavily on competition rather than government intervention. He also wants to see the states take a far greater role in fostering that completion and in forming risk pools that would insure coverage for the sickest citizens.” (Arnst, 2008 Business Week)
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
1. Klein, Karen “How Health Care Reform Will Affect Small Business” Business Week 14, April 2010
2. Gatty, Bob “ House healthcare reform bill includes LTC provisions” Frontlines 16, December 2009
3. Dillion, Tamara “Healthcare Jobs You Might Not Know About” Occupational Outlook Quarterly Summer 2008
4. Feder, Lester “ Fighting For Our Health” The Nation 27, April 2009
5. “Obamaism (The Talk of the Town) Barrack Obama’s economic policy” The New Yorker 13, April 2009
6. Shane, Scott “Time to Cut Red Tape for Startups” Business Week 30 December 2009
7. Karen Klein “How Health Care Reform Will Affect Small Business” Business Week 14 April 2010
8. Arnst, Catherine “McCain’s Health-Care Proposal – More competition amongst insurers, spurred by tax credit” 30, April 2008 – Business Week
|
|
|
|